Category blog-829

Since every time this topic is raised, all the fuss comes down to the fact that we are all modest and do not express our own opinions, hiding behind the general “I don’t care” silence, then, it seems to me, this is an objective solution to the issue. So, how many comments should a smoking room be limited to for your comfortable stay on blogs, after exceeding which the next edition should be filed??
And I urge you to stick to the chosen date, know when the end of the smoking room is approaching, fill in the space for the next one in time, and spend at least some effort on its design. We all live in the same place, so let’s kindly maintain its noble appearance. Thank you.

Upd: The evening has passed, you can count it. At the time of counting, 62 people voted (of which 11 abstained), that is, 51 ratings, 1 vote each for 1300, 1450, 1600, 1700, and 1750, 3 votes for 1350 and 1400 comments, 4 for 1250, 5 for 1200, 10 for 1000 and 1500, and 11 – for (apparently, not everyone is sitting on buckets, which makes me happy:) over 1750 (I took 1800 for calculation). Arithmetic mean – 1408.8 comments. Very revealing, thanks everyone 🙂

Best comments

It took less time than I thought, because the discussion thread in the last smoking room contained almost no useful information. So what?.
Disclaimer: the phrase “I believe” will appear too rarely in the text. Don’t take this as an indication that I don’t take other people’s opinions into account or think too much of myself, this is just what I would do if I had the sole right to do so. World.
To begin with, Stig’s data on the average life expectancy of smokers with varying numbers of comments:
Posts – days:
1200 – 5;
1350 – 7;
1500 – 9.
As you can see, towards the end of the smoking room the filling rate slows down (t.e., Over the last 4 days there have been an average of 300 comments). T.oh, you can add one more parameter – average number of posts/day (av/d).
Posts – days – sqp/d:
1200 – 5 – 240;
1350 – 7 – 193;
1500 – 9 – 167.
As you can see, the skp/d decreases greatly, mainly due to a strong decrease in the amount of activity in the end. This picture emerges for several reasons:
1) The larger the smoking room, the longer it obviously takes to load. On some configurations (for example, mine), the loading time becomes completely indecent as the number of comments increases, so I prefer to conduct active discussions in the opening/middlegame of the smoking room.
2) As the number of comments increases, the likelihood that someone will roll out a new smoking room and interrupt the discussion mid-sentence increases; accordingly, the number of starts of such discussions decreases in anticipation of a new smoking room.

Accordingly, in order to maintain a relatively high efficiency, the bar upon reaching which the roll occurs should not be excessively high.
Need to install some strips to indicate smoking room states.
1200 comments. By this time, if someone is concerned about preparing the next smoking room, then he calmly waits until 1300 comments and posts it, if not, this is a great sign that it’s time to use your imagination and make a topic. Ideally, of course, there would be a situation where, upon laying out a new smoking room, someone immediately begins to prepare a new one, but this is on everyone’s personal conscience.
1300 comments. If there is a ready-made smoking room, this is the number of comments at which its author should post it. As you approach this number of comments, you should begin to consider stopping discussions or carefully preparing the ground for moving to the next post. If there is still no ready-made smoking room – this is, primo, very bad, secundo – a sign that you need to turn on at least some imagination and cut a smoking room immediately, even if it’s small, but at least culturally designed. In this case, the bar is raised to 1400 comments, and before this time the smoking room must be completed.
1400 comments. The most extreme level, upon reaching which it is necessary to lay out the smoking room. A similar bar is set if an active and attention-demanding discussion happened at the end of the smoking room, or the inhabitants of the smoking room turned out to be so lazy or busy (but we all know that the first situation happens much more often) that no one prepared the smoking room for 1300 comments. If such a bar is reached, but there is still no smoking room, then in any case a basic post-roll is created, consisting of rules and the line “Work in progress”, which is then brought into a more or less divine form within the next few days (read: an hour or two).
Naturally, it is better to try to avoid the latter situation.

In this way, an optimal bar is established for the duration of the smoking room, within which it is convenient to conduct discussions even for those with not very good configurations, and which, being still a bar, will be a guideline for people to focus on when conducting discussions and creating new topics. It will be good for developing some culture of communication.

Why options for every 50? https://luckymistercasino.uk/mobile-app/ You specifically made it difficult to draw specific conclusions? 🙂

The rest of the options are garbage.

The fact that a fixed number is needed, in my opinion, is obvious: it’s convenient, it will become a habit, everyone will know when the smoking room is over, and no one will suddenly interrupt the dialogue, plus a certain culture will be developed.

And finally, no one will whine, and this is a huge plus in itself. All possible whining will be killed in this topic.

How increasing the number of options interferes with specific choices? Now that’s getting into a pose and fussing over little things. Average, just the opposite, it would be more accurate, there was no bad second thought.

Specific numbers – yes, superfluous. Define the area – still no. To understand when to prepare a smoking room for those who wish. Healthy.
Otherwise I agree.

Too many options distract attention and complicate the choice; open any book on sociology.

You know, I would ask you a counter question: what is normal smoking room and how it differs from abnormal?

Yeah, propaganda is also an unscience and is never based on the methods of sociology, including.h. does not manipulate consciousness by presenting very well-formulated questions 🙂

But that’s true, yes, lyrics. Who am I to guide the stubborn on the right path ^_^

No, it’s just that she occupies such an insignificant place in my life that it’s simply stupid to pay such attention; in my opinion, it doesn’t matter either to the dispute or to the method of voting.

That’s right, because he provided clear evidence that they had previously agreed on 1500, and not only one agreed, but your voice was not heard then. And you can throw out similar arguments ad infinitum, or you can behave like an adult and wait for results. Is it true? WITH: